A recent case drives home the importance of impartiality when any "expert" is retained to be a neutral. Traditionally, experts are hired by one side or the other. Technically, in that situation the "expert" should remain impartial and the opinions should be based upon the facts. However, when an "expert" is designated by the court, a much higher standard is expected. This is a lesson learned for all. What are your thoughts?
G.K. Las Vegas Ltd. P’ship v. Simon Prop. Group, 2009 WL 4283086 (D. Nev. Nov. 30, 2009). Here is an article about the case.
No comments:
Post a Comment